Please. Kasparov is nothing but a darling of the zapadnik media, as is Mikhail Gorbachov. You would think from the attention from the zapadnik media and academe that Mikhail Sergeyevich had serious support in the rodina. Actually, you could gather his supporters in an old-fashioned phone booth with room to spare, I would say.
The zapadnik media do not realise that Russian culture and civilisation are not based on the same postulates as the West. Our culture is free of the rot from post-Enlightenment thought (except for the lingering effects of communism, which was an attempt to graft radical Westernism upon Russia), so, they get things utterly wrong as they do not understand our cultural imperatives. For instance, most zapadnik journalists are atheists, so, they do not understand the profoundly religious (primarily Orthodox) foundation of our civilisation.
In any case, none of the articles quoted surprised me. It is the usual rot served up by the zapadnik media. Let me give a small (but telling) example. Recently, Marija Sherefovich won the 2007 ESC with her song "Molitva". Well, we all know that that means "Prayer". Some godless Westerner translated it into English as "Destiny!" Well, "destiny" is "sudba", not "molitva". It destroyed the meaning of this beautiful song by a talented Serbian singer. It turned a song with strong religious overtones into an atheistic self-centred anthem. That is what we are dealing with! Deliberate and conscious manipulation of the truth by the zapadnik media. Remember this whenever you hear them pontificate concerning the rodina.
Why the Council on Foreign Relations Hates Putin Why Murdoch's Journal Loves Kasparov By MIKE WHITNEY
On Sunday, Putin's party, United Russia, stormed to victory in the country's parliamentary elections with 63 per cent of the vote. It was a romp. United Russia now controls 306 of the 450 seats in the Duma, an overwhelming majority. The balloting was a referendum on Putin's leadership and it passed in a landslide. Now it's certain, that even if Putin steps down as president next year as expected, he will be the dominant player in Russian politics for the foreseeable future.
Vladamir Putin is arguably the most popular leader in Russian history, although you'd never know it by reading the western media. According to a recent survey conducted by the Wall Street Journal, Putin's personal approval rating in November 2007 was 85 per cent, making him the most popular head of state in the world today. Putin's popularity derives from many factors. He is personally clever and charismatic. He is fiercely nationalistic and has worked tirelessly to improve the lives of ordinary Russians and restore the country to its former greatness. He has raised over 20 million Russians out of grinding poverty, improved education, health care and the pension system, (partially) nationalized critical industries, lowered unemployment, increased manufacturing and exports, invigorated Russian markets, strengthened the ruble, raised the overall standard of living, reduced government corruption, jailed or exiled the venal oligarchs, and amassed capital reserves of $450 billion.
Russia is no longer up for grabs like it was after the fall of the Soviet Union. Putin put an end to all of that. He reasserted control over the country's vast resources and he's using them to improve the lives of his own people. This is a real departure from the 1990s, when the drunken Yeltsin steered Russia into economic disaster by following Washington's neoliberal edicts and by selling Russia's Crown Jewels to the vulturous oligarchs. Putin put Russia's house back in order; stabilized the ruble, strengthened economic/military alliances in the region, and removed the corporate gangsters who had stolen Russia's national assets for pennies on the dollar. The oligarchs are now all either in jail or have fled the country. Russia is no longer for sale.
Russia is, once again, a major world power and a vital source of hydrocarbons. It's star is steadily rising just as America's has begun to wane. This may explain why Putin is loathed by the West. Freud might call it petroleum envy, but it's deeper than that. Putin has charted a course for social change that conflicts with basic tenets of neoliberalism, which are the principles which govern US foreign policy. He is not a member of the corporate-banking brotherhood which believes the wealth of the world should be divided among themselves regardless of the suffering or destruction it may cause. Putin's primary focus is Russia; Russia's welfare, Russia's sovereignty and Russia's place in the world. He is not a globalist.
That is why the Bush administration has encircled Russia with military bases, toppled neighboring regimes with its color-coded revolutions, (which were organized by US NGOs and intelligence services) intervened in Russian elections, and threatened to deploy an (allegedly defensive) nuclear weapons system in Eastern Europe. Russia is seen as a potential rival to US imperial ambitions and must be contained or subverted.
In the early years of his presidency, it was believed that Putin would comply with western demands and accept a subordinate role in the US-EU-Israel centric system. But that hasn't happened. Putin has stubbornly defended Russian independence and resisted integration into the prevailing system. .
The triumphalism which swept through Washington after the fall of the Berlin Wall has been replaced with a palpable fear that Russia's power will grow as oil prices continue to soar. The tectonic plates of geopolitical power are gradually shifting eastward. That's why the US has joined in The Great Game and is trying to put down roots in Eurasia. Still, it's easy to imagine a scenario in which America's access to the last great oil and natural gas reserves on the planet--the three trillion barrels of oil and natural gas located in the Caspian Basin---could be completely blocked by a resurgent Russian superpower.
The most powerful of the Washington think tanks, the Council on Foreign Relations, recognized this problem early on and decided that US policy towards Russia had to be reworked entirely.
* * *
John Edwards and Jack Kemp were appointed to lead a CFR task force which concocted the pretext for an all-out assault on the Putin. This is where the idea that Putin is "rolling back democracy" began. In their article "Russia's Wrong Direction", Edwards and Kemp state that a "strategic partnership" with Russia is no longer possible. They claim that the government has become increasingly authoritarian and that the society is growing less "open and pluralistic".
Kemp and Edwards provided the ideological foundation upon which the entire public relations campaign against Putin has been built. And it is quite an impressive campaign. A Google News search shows roughly 1,400 articles from the various news services on Putin. Virtually all of them contain exactly the same rhetoric, the same buzzwords, the same spurious claims, the same slanders. It is impossible to find even one article out of 1,400 that diverges the slightest bit from the talking points which originated at the Council on foreign Relations.
It's interesting to see to what extent the media has become a propaganda bullhorn for the national security state. Putin's personal approval ratings confirm his enormous popularity, and yet, the media continues to treat him like he's a tyrant. It is utterly incongruous.
In most articles, Putin is disparaged as "anti democratic"; a charge that is never leveled at the Saudi Royal family even though women are forbidden to drive, they must be fully-covered at all times, and can be stoned to death if they are found to be unfaithful. Also, in Saudi Arabia, beheading is still the punishment of choice for capital crimes.
When Saudi King Abdullah visits the US, he is not heaped with scorn for his regimes' repressive treatment of his people. Instead he's rewarded with flattering photos of he and George Bush strolling arm-n-arm through the Crawford sage.
Why is Putin blasted for "rolling back democracy" when American client, Mikhail Saakashvili, arbitrarily declares martial law and deploys his truncheon-wielding Robo-cops to beat protesters senseless before dragging them off to the Georgia gulag? The pictures of Saakashvili's bloody crackdown appeared in the foreign press, but not in the US. Rather, the media had all its cameras focused on Garry Kasparov (contributing editor to the Wall Street Journal and right-wing loony) as he was led off to the Moscow hoosegow in handcuffs for protesting without a permit.
* * *
Putin's real crime is that he serves Russia's national interests rather than the interests of global Capital. He also rejects Washington's "unipolar" world model. As he said in Munich:
"The unipolar world refers to a world in which there is one master, one sovereign; one center of authority, one center of force, one center of decision-making. At the end of the day this is pernicious not only for all those within this system, but also for the sovereign itself because it destroys itself from within.
"What is even more important is that the model itself is flawed because at its basis there is and can be no moral foundations for modern civilization."
"We are seeing a greater and greater disdain for the basic principles of international law....We are witnessing an almost uncontained hyper use of force -- military force -- in international relations, force that is plunging the world into an abyss of permanent conflicts. I am convinced that we have reached that decisive moment when we must seriously think about the architecture of global security."
Well said, Vladimir.
Putin's no saint, but he doesn't deserve the thrashing he gets from the western media.
And a final word on Garry Kasparov
On Sunday, while Putin's party "United Russia" was screeching to a landslide victory, Reuters News was busy taking mug-shots of the stony-faced Kasparov holding up Florida-style ballots claiming the voting was rigged. "They are not just rigging the vote," Kasparov moaned, "They are raping the whole electoral system. These elections are a reminder of Soviet elections when there was no choice.....Putin is going to have a hard time trying to rule like Stalin."
Stalin? So now Putin is Stalin? First of all, when did Reuters begin to take such a keen interest in voting irregularities? It must be a recent development, becuase they were nowhere to be found in the 2000 presidential election. And when did they start to pay attention to "political dissent"? They certainly never wasted any video-footage on the antiwar rallies in the US. Are we to believe that they are more interested in democracy in Russia than America?
And why is Reuters so eager to provide valuable column-space to a washed-up chessmaster who's only interested in making a nuisance of himself by bellyaching about voter fraud? That's not news; it's propaganda.
As for Kasparov and his silly accusations; he should be glad that he lives in Putin's Russia rather than Stalin's or he'd be in leg-irons right now boarding a northbound train to the Siberian outback.
What is Kasparov doing in Moscow anyway? And why is this little man --with virtually no political base -- such a big part of the western media narrative? Is he only there to discredit the election and throw a little more muck on Putin or is there more to it than that?
Garry Kasparov should give up politics and do what he does best; stand-up comedy. Watching Kasparov traipse around Moscow with his basket of sour grapes and his entourage of western media-stooges is like watching "Mr. Bean's Excellent Kremlin Adventure", a particularly lame performance in a dismal B-rated burlesque. It's painful to watch.
Kasparov's party, the "Other Russia" couldn't manage even a 2 per cent rating in the polls. The party is a complete dud. In fact, Reuters even (reluctantly) admits as much in its article.
Here's the clip. Reuters: "Kasparov and his "Other Russia" dissident movement are not standing in Sunday's parliamentary election because they could not get registered as a party. THEY ENJOY LITTLE PUBLIC SUPPORT AMONG RUSSIANS BUT HAVE A BIG FOLLOWING IN THE WEST." (Reuters) "Big following in the West"? Why doesn't that surprise me?
So, in other words, Kasparov has no base of support in Russia, and yet he gets his own camera crew and media team to follow him around recording every silly he says. That's just great. Who do they think he is; Nelson Mandela?
Kasparov is a contributing editor of Murdoch's Wall Street Journal; so he already has a regular platform for launching his tirades on the "tyrannical" Mr. Putin. Normally, one doesn't get a spot on the op-ed page of the WSJ unless their politics are somewhere to the right of Augusto Pinochet. That's probably the case with Kasparov, too. In Saturday's edition of the WSJ, Kasparov delivered his latest absurd soliloquy disparaging Putin and recounting his agonizing 5 day ordeal in the Moscow poky.
Although Kasparov has garnered little public support in Russia, he appears to have a loyal following among the Washington elite. According to Wikipedia: "In 1991, Kasparov received the Keeper of the Flame award from the Center for Security Policy (a US think tank), for anti-Communist resistance and the propagation of democracy. Kasparov was an exceptional recipient since the award is given to "individuals for devoting their public careers to the defense of the United States and American values around the world". Hmmmm...."For devoting their public careers to the defense of the United States and American values around the world"? Isn't that a definition of an American agent?
Again, according to Wikipedia: In April, 2007 it was asserted that Kasparov was a board member of the National Security Advisory Council of the Center for Security Policy, a non-profit, non-partisan national security organization that specializes in identifying policies, actions, and resource needs that are vital to American security". Kasparov confirmed this and added that he was removed shortly after he became aware of it. He noted that HE DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT THE MEMBERSHIP and suggested he was included in the board by an accident because he received the 1991 Keeper of the Flame award from this organization. But Kasparov maintained his association with the neoconservative leadership by giving speeches at think tanks such as the Hoover Institute."
Here's a list of some of the other fellow travelers who've been given the "Keeper of the Flame Award": 2007-Senator Joe Lieberman. 2004-General Peter Pace. 2003- Paul Wolfowitz. 2002- General Richard Meyers. 1998-Donald Rumsfeld. 1996-Newt Gingrich. 1995-Ronald Reagan. 1990-Casper Weinberger.
Is Kasparov an anomaly or does he fit right in with this coven of far-right loonies? And who are some of the prominent members of the Center for Security Policy? Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, Frank Gaffney, James Roche and Laura Ingraham. Oh, boy. The whole front office of the neocon's cuckoo's nest. Now tell me, dear reader, with friends like that; what should we really think about Kasparov's performance in Moscow? Is he really interested in "democracy promotion" as he claims or is their acting out a script that was prepared in Washington?
In the US, Kasparov has become the focal point of the Russian elections - the primary source of "unbiased" analysis. NPR reiterates his spurious claims every half hour. The other news agencies are no better. He has become the distorted lens through which Americans view Russian democracy. This says a lot more about the choke-hold the neocons still have on the media rather than anything objective about Russia. The Kasparov fiasco gives us a chance to see the inner-workings of the establishment media. It's nothing more than a propaganda bullhorn for far-right organizations executing their bloody imperial strategy. Fidel Castro summed it up best just days ago when he said: "It is the most sophisticated media ever developed by technology, employed to kill human beings and to subjugate or exterminate peoples".
Amen to that, Fidel.
Mike Whitney lives in Washington state. He can be reached at: email@example.com
Vladimir Putin’s United Russia party has nominated First Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev as its candidate for next March's Presidential election. The news came at a joint meeting with three other Russian political parties - Fair Russia, the Agrarian Party and Civil Force.
President Vladimir Putin is giving his backing to Medvedev.
“I know him for 17 years and fully support his candidacy,” Putin said.
The presidential election will take place on 2 March.
Several people have already declared their willingness to run for the presidency.
Among them are Communist leader, Gennady Zuganov, Liberal Democrat leader Vladimir Zhirinovsky, and well-known dissident Vladimir Bukovsky.
Monday's announcement has taken the political world by surprise. The country's bigges party - United Russia - was not expected to reveal its candidate until December 17, when the party holds its congress.
Dmitry Medvedev came to national prominence in Russia after being put in charge of national projects. He's been appointed to make improvements to housing, education and health across the country.
Improving agriculture was one of his top priorities. He lashed out at some regional authorities who he thought were not helping farmers enough.
Medvedev a 'can-do' guy
Russia today's political commentator Peter Lavelle says Medvedev has proved himself as an effective operator.
“As a nominee Dmitry Medvedev is everything we should be looking for: he has got experience in government, he is very close to President Putin and he has taken some tough jobs in reforming the economic infrastructure. He has shown that he is a “can do” guy. So, overall he has all the qualifications that we should have expected from someone that follow a very big choose of Vladimir Putin,” Lavelle said.
I thought Ivanov the other Deputy Prime Minister would have been a good or better choice. He seemed tougher to me. I hope this Medvedev man is up to the task though.
I think that there is going to be a restoration of the monarchy (the tsar as a constitutional figure-head, VVP as the prime minister). There have been interesting things floated by the usual sources in the Russian media (see: www.interfax-religion.com/?act=news&div=4047). In short, the tsar shall do all the ceremonial duties that Putin detests, whilst VVP holds on to real power (he is a man singularly lacking in megalomania, one must say). If the monarchy is restored, do not look for the Vladimirovchi to sit on the throne. No descendant of the Red-lovers K.R. and Ducky should be allowed anywhere near power (no fear of that, for VVP detests Maria Vladimirovna, as does any decent person).
The joy of life consists in the exercise of one's energies, continual growth, constant change, the enjoyment of every new experience. To stop means simply to die. The eternal mistake of mankind is to set up an attainable ideal
If he is, what of it? I speak as an Orthodox Christian. Many Jews have ennobled Russia, many others have besmirched it. You go on a case-by-case basis. There are Russians who have been traitors and pigs, as well.
Russia has always been a multi-national and multi-confessional state. I find the implied antsemitism of some posters offensive and contrary to the facts. Do not forget that Lenin was a Russian by nationality (after all, his father was one of the service nobility!)!
To me, heroes of Russia are just that, regardless of their nationality or faith. Need I mention that the last victorious campaign in Chechnya was led by a Muslim Tartar general? One of my dedi served as an officer in the Savage Division in World War I. The troopers were all Muslim Chechens. They were accounted the best Russian unit of the war, and the Germans feared them.
We should hold ourselves to high standards, as our civilisation and culture are superior to those of the decadent West. Our posts should reflect this reality.
In any case they as a nation have showed hostility to everything we are. Of course their will always be the case of the exception the rule of those that do good.
Russia has always been an Orthodox Russian state. Minorities in Russia have only started to increase their populations during soviet era. Before this time their numbers were so insignificant to have then even pose a concern. Your buddy Lenin was no Russian either. He was Kalmyk-Jewish-German with a little Russian.
I think you have lived in America too long that you confuse the definitions of Nationalism and Patriotism. Let me put it simply for you
Nationalism = Loyalty to the nation(narod) Patriotism = Loyalty to the state
We are Slavs for Slavs! Not for any multicultural ideas like the West has
The joy of life consists in the exercise of one's energies, continual growth, constant change, the enjoyment of every new experience. To stop means simply to die. The eternal mistake of mankind is to set up an attainable ideal
Zormovich: Russia thinks it can win by brute force and that it can enslave other countries. It can only enslave weak Russians who are scares to fight for their own freedom in their country. All ture Slavic people will gladly kill all Russians. Stay being a slave.
Apr 7, 2022 14:36:30 GMT -5
Zormovich: You hate ukranians for no reason other than wanting Russians to rule them and power. Cannot wait for your mixed Mongolian blood to sstarve soon. Enjoy your corruption and cheap Chinese food.
Apr 7, 2022 14:38:18 GMT -5
SlavsAgainstNaziRussians: This Tsar talking about serfdom when russian people starve and are killed by their own government. hahahah Russians are slaves living in fear everyday 🤣
Apr 7, 2022 18:12:29 GMT -5
BanningFreeSpeech: Hey morons, banning me means nothing. You are Nazi like your government you are slave to. Get on your knees and suck off your local officials slaves.
Apr 8, 2022 13:02:44 GMT -5
TsarSamuil: Considering how EU destroyed east european industry after the cold war, you think ukraine will get some marshal plan when eu has screwed over everyone so far? I mean, you are probably braindead americans who know nothing about anything..
Apr 9, 2022 19:18:34 GMT -5
Chorny-Vor: Zormovich, my Russian ass and your traitor tongue could become good friends.
Apr 12, 2022 13:49:08 GMT -5
Igor Malinovski: 70 days, and they're still fighting for Mariupol.
May 4, 2022 13:18:31 GMT -5
TsarSamuil: If it wasn't for Russian civilians, they could have carpet-bombed the area, turned it into a parking lot, in general there has been very small scale mass bombings, far below what they are capable of..
May 16, 2022 23:13:49 GMT -5
Lupul Dacic: Tanks seem to be quite outdated. They are too easy targets for drones and javelins.
May 25, 2022 6:08:38 GMT -5
Lupul Dacic: On the other hand, I know a shit about that.
May 28, 2022 4:40:48 GMT -5
구경꾼: Well by the looks of it, I believe that Ukraine will inevitably win the war. No way that the Russkies are going to get this far.
Jun 15, 2022 13:20:10 GMT -5
구경꾼: It is quite pathetic to support Russia unconditionally.
Jun 15, 2022 13:39:03 GMT -5
구경꾼: All their supporters rely on is their own echo chambers of misinformation.
Jun 15, 2022 13:39:32 GMT -5
구경꾼: Antagonisation of the West will only bring you down.
Jun 17, 2022 0:59:44 GMT -5
Boro: This war is a tragedy, and "the West" contributed a lot to the escalation.
Jun 19, 2022 1:18:23 GMT -5
Boro: Tsar, what's up?
Jun 25, 2022 17:41:13 GMT -5
TsarSamuil: hello, sorri, been busy, will be free whole july, will update posts fer sure then, or before then
Jun 27, 2022 10:16:49 GMT -5
TsarSamuil: seems like Russia is crushing the ukrainian twitter warriors
Jun 27, 2022 10:17:22 GMT -5
Boro: Don't be sorry. Life has priority. Take Care.
Jun 28, 2022 15:35:39 GMT -5